Self-inspection of Orthopedic Surgery Appliances and Devices
Enterprise-wide Use License -
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau
Notification No. 0311001
March 11, 2004
To: Each metropolitan and prefectural Head of
Public Health Department (Bureau)
From: Director
Safety Division
Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau
MHLW
Self-inspection of Orthopedic Surgery Appliances and Devices
Reusable orthopedic surgery appliances are leased by manufactures to
medical institutions per demand. Recently, cases are reported that such
appliances break down during operation leaving fractions of device in the human
body. A survey revealed a hammer-crack on such a device, and therefore, the
cause is deemed to be a metal fatigue. It was impossible to clarify, however,
when the metal fatigue had begun due to dissatisfactory quality control of leasing
appliances.
Break down of appliances during operation can lead to leaving fractions in
the body, extension of surgery time. The authority hereby ask those who may
concern to perform necessary inspection according to the following procedure
and carry out adequate measures.
Appendix: see p. 5
Note: The title of the PFSB Notification in Japanese.
Appendix
Self-inspection
of Orthopedic Surgery Appliances and Devices
Manufacturers, importing and sales agents, and licensed manufactures or
local agents of overseas products of reusable orthopedic surgery appliances
should self-inspect their appliances and if necessary, take the following
measures. At the same time, they should notify the medical institutions on the
adequate use of the appliance in a thorough manner.
1. Detailed Procedure Manual should be composed to verify the quality of
restored appliances and those prior to leasing in order to effectively
remove those with deformation, deterioration and other quality
deficiencies.
2. The Procedure Manual should be made so to enable the processing
each device fully and independently. When inspecting the returned
appliance, procedures such as cleansing, sterilizing, and others should
be conducted separately by each device in order to avoid mixing up with
devices of different manufacturing year.
3. The years of durability or number of usages should be established for
each part of the device based on scientific data to prevent malfunction of
the appliance.
4. For the package inserts, it should be reconfirmed on whether instructions
for cautions for medical institutions are included in precautions, which
indicate such factors as contraindication or restriction of use. Promptly
revise when postscripts are necessary.
(The above signed)
Note: Medicines (largely pharmaceutical and biologicals) and quasi-medicines
(quasi-drugs), cosmetics and medical devices are the four categories of the regulated
medicinal products in Japan.
MHLW/PFSB Notification No. 0311011/March 11, 2004 Japanese Regulations
Copyright (c) 2001-2004 by JKS LLC - 3 -